Radical archivist Carl Malamud writes, “Since 2008, Public.Resource.Org has been trying to get the IRS to release the database of the annual reports of nonprofits in a better way. The nonprofit sector in the U.S. represents $1.5 trillion in economic activity and over 9% of jobs.” Read the rest
More:
IRS finally agrees to do something about its $1.5 trillion nonprofit database
Hillary Clinton’s burgeoning presidential campaign is not off to a good start. Just a day after papers reported that the former Secretary of State would make a bid for the nation’s highest office in April, The New York Times reports that Hillary Clinton used only her personal email address while serving as Secretary of State . This is bad. Read more…
Originally posted here:
Hillary Clinton Hid Her Emails While Secretary of State and That’s Bad
Alan sez, “According to various media reports ( e.g. BBC ) the technology subreddit has scrubbed its moderator team after users discovered that the sub was holding a secret censorship list of banned words that included ‘National Security Agency’, ‘GCHQ’, ‘Anonymous’, ‘anti-piracy’, ‘Bitcoin’, ‘Snowden’, ‘net neutrality’, ‘EU Court’, ‘startup’ and ‘Assange’. On its face, this looks like a list of politicized terms, and blocking them looks like a highly political and partisan act — for example, by blocking “net neutrality,” then stories that are critical of network discrimination would be blocked, while straight news stories that overwhelmingly quoted corporate spokespeople using uncritical terms would make the front door. More charitably, it may have been the act of overworked (and ultimately irresponsible) moderators to simply ban hot-button topics altogether. Here’s the Reddit post that outed /r/technology’s moderators. Once the news got publicized, the moderator team did a ‘U turn’ and removed the auto-deletion software, as well as booting the mods responsible for it in the first place. Still, as the BBC story notes, the technology sub is no longer “featured”, meaning it doesn’t appear in the subreddits that are promoted to new users and appear on the front page. Reddit downgrades technology community after censorship [BBC] ( Thanks, Alan ! )
Excerpt from:
Reddit’s /r/technology demoted over scandal of secret censorship that blocked Internet freedom stories
The NSA is to cut 90% of its 1, 000 sysadmins in a bid to reduce the risk of leaks. NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden was a network administrator, charged with keeping the machines running on the network of vast data-centers used by the NSA to harvest, store and analyze unimaginably large quantities of data.
View article:
NSA firing 90% of its sysadmins to eliminate potential Snowdens
In what could prove to be a major breakthrough in quantum memory storage and information processing, German researchers have frozen the fastest thing in the universe: light. And they did so for a record-breaking one minute. Read more…
Remember when rogue archivist Carl Malamud asked the IRS for data on $1.5 trillion worth of data from nonprofit organizations ?
Excerpt from:
IRS database of nonprofits is filled with unredacted SSNs
Rogue archivist Carl Malamud sez, On November 1, Public.Resource.Org released a new service which put 6,461,326 US nonprofit tax returns on the net for bulk download, developers, and search engines to access. We offered to give the working system to the government, and also sent them a few suggestions on ways they could better meet their mission and save themselves a boatload of money. Since then, we’ve been frantically trying to get the government’s attention to take decisive action, but to no avail. The way the government makes the nonprofit tax returns available to the public is broken in many ways. The IRS insists on selling the tax returns as a monthly feed of DVDs costing $2,580 per year. Each month, I get a stack of a dozen DVDs, each one has 60,000 1-page TIFF files on it. This is just so lacking in clue, and even simple suggestions like using Dropbox instead of mailing us DVDs have been ignored. In terms of breakage though, the truly big problem is the deliberate dumbing down of tax returns for large nonprofits in order to avoid what an IRS official actually said to us would be “too much transparency.” All the big nonprofits have to e-file their tax returns. E-filing means they submit actual machine-processable data encoded in XML. The way the IRS releases that information is mind-boggling. They image the data onto tax forms and then release them as 200 dot per inch TIFF files. So, instead of having a computer program extract the gross revenue, or the CEO salaries, or whether or not the nonprofit operates a tanning salon on premises (an actual question on the form!), you get something that is so bad that OCR is difficult. Nonprofits are a $1.5 trillion chunk of the U.S. economy, yet we’re deliberately dumbing down data that could make that sector more efficient and more vibrant. That’s dumb. Since November, we’ve been trying to get the IRS and the Obama Administration to release this information, but they’ve refused. We’ve met with all sorts of IRS officials such as Lois Lerner and Joseph Grant of Tea Party fame, and we’ve also met with a ton of boldface names in the White House, such as Todd Park (the President’s CTO) and Steve VanRoekel (the Federal CIO). Nobody will release the data. The IRS is worried the big nonprofits will be upset if information such as multimillion-dollar CEO salaries is more readily available. Since discussion hasn’t worked so far, we’ve retained the services of Thomas R. Burke, an eminent First Amendment attorney at Davis Wright Tremaine and he’s been working with our own counselor David Halperin. Today, they filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. One reason we picked the Northern District because they have a requirement that the parties try and work out their problems out of court using what is known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which includes techniques such as mediation and arbitration. The ADR rules in this District Court require each party to bring to the mediation an official who has the authority to resolve this issue. So, I’m reaching out to my good friends Todd Park and Steve VanRoekel, the architects of the President’s great new machine-processable data directive, and I’m personally asking them to help us resolve this dispute with the administration. We’re all on the same side here, let’s work this out and get on with the real job at hand! Links: Our complaint in district court Copies of our letters back and forth to the White House and the IRS Sunlight Foundation: Nonprofit E-file Data Should Be Open Think Progress: How the IRS Could Make it Easier to Track Dark Money, Right Now Forbes: IRS: Turn Over a New Leaf, Open Up Data