China on the Forefront of 3D-Printed Housing

While China had their Industrial Revolution rather late in the global game, their production might and speed means they’ll likely advance new digital fabrication techniques before the rest of the world does. For example, it’s been ten years since the American outfit Contour Crafting first proposed 3D printing houses, but aside from a brief surge of TED-Talk-inspired press in 2012, they’ve been mostly quiet. In that time, meanwhile, China has begun developing their 3D-printed-house-erecting capabilities in earnest. The Shanghai-based WinSun Decoration Design Engineering company recently printed ten sample structures of 200 square meters each. What’s amazing is that they produced the entire lot in less than 24 hours, and that the cost of each house is less than US $5, 000. The concrete-like building material comes “entirely out of recycled materials [and is] a mixture of construction and industrial waste” which the company claims is environmentally friendly (although they don’t provide specifics on the material). (more…)

View original post here:
China on the Forefront of 3D-Printed Housing

Gibson has crammed a digital recorder inside a guitar cable

When I was an aspiring musician a few years back, I’d always forget new guitar licks that would arise from just messing around at rehearsals. Well, Gibson is looking to remedy that, and has partnered up with Tascam to do so. The result is the Memory Cable: a 1/4-inch instrument cable for guitar, bass, synths, drum machines and keyboards with a built-in audio recorder. Capable of capturing up to 13 hours of tunes, the accessory tracks to a micro SD card in CD-quality 44.1kHz/16-bit resolution which can be easily uploaded to recording software — should the need arise. Uncrate reports that the add-on will be priced at $100 when it arrives in the US on May 15th. This rate includes the 16-foot cable with a 4GB micro SD card, but we’re not seeing any official word from Gibson just yet. Of course, you’ll be able to record your entire gig to see just how bad you messed up. So there’s that. Filed under: Misc , Peripherals Comments Via: Uncrate Source: Gibson

More:
Gibson has crammed a digital recorder inside a guitar cable

Watch The Nymi Heartbeat Identification Wristband Personalize Its Wearer’s PC

 Toronto-based hardware startup Bionym gave a special public demo of its Nymi ECG authentication and identification wristband at the monthly We Are Wearables event yesterday, and talked a bit about their product in more detail, now that it’s well on its way to production. The Nymi measures a user’s heart beat, and uses that to verify their identity and then perform various handshake… Read More

Excerpt from:
Watch The Nymi Heartbeat Identification Wristband Personalize Its Wearer’s PC

Stanford Bioengineers Develop ‘Neurocore’ Chips 9,000 Times Faster Than a PC

kelk1 sends this article from the Stanford News Service: “Stanford bioengineers have developed faster, more energy-efficient microchips based on the human brain – 9, 000 times faster and using significantly less power than a typical PC (abstract). Kwabena Boahen and his team have developed Neurogrid, a circuit board consisting of 16 custom-designed ‘Neurocore’ chips. Together these 16 chips can simulate 1 million neurons and billions of synaptic connections. The team designed these chips with power efficiency in mind. Their strategy was to enable certain synapses to share hardware circuits. … But much work lies ahead. Each of the current million-neuron Neurogrid circuit boards cost about $40, 000. (…) Neurogrid is based on 16 Neurocores, each of which supports 65, 536 neurons. Those chips were made using 15-year-old fabrication technologies. By switching to modern manufacturing processes and fabricating the chips in large volumes, he could cut a Neurocore’s cost 100-fold – suggesting a million-neuron board for $400 a copy.” Read more of this story at Slashdot.

Read this article:
Stanford Bioengineers Develop ‘Neurocore’ Chips 9,000 Times Faster Than a PC

Step Inside The Historic Photo Archive Stored In an Underground Mine

Boyers, Pennsylvania, is home to the Iron Mountain storage facility, a former limestone mine that is now the storage site of more than 15 million photographic negatives and prints, all preserved hundreds of feet underground. This documentary , produced by the Hillman Photography Initiative , takes you inside for a glimpse at the collection and the folks who maintain it. Read more…

See the original article here:
Step Inside The Historic Photo Archive Stored In an Underground Mine

The plant with 1000 faces

There is a vine that is capable of contorting the size, shape, color, orientation, and vein patterns of its leaves to match nearby foliage. It’s able to match not just one or two other species, but a whole host of them. Nobody has any clue how it knows what neighboring plants look like .

More:
The plant with 1000 faces

What you need to know to keep the Feds out of your phone

If you’re arrested for overdue speeding tickets, is it acceptable for the police to search the phone on your person? How about if you’re arrested for drug trafficking? In the eyes of the law, there is no difference: If you’re arrested, you’re arrested, whatever the crime. Isn’t that an invasion of privacy? That depends on your interpretation of the US Constitution’s Fourth Amendment, which states: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” That’s why two cases being heard at the United States Supreme Court today are of such importance. Both cases hinge on whether police are legally allowed to search the contents of mobile phones confiscated from arrestees, and the decisions leveled by the Supreme Court will impact every citizen in the United States. WHAT IS IT? Across two hours this morning, the Supreme Court will hear the cases of David Riley and Brima Wurie. In the case of Riley (Riley v. California), a smartphone is at the heart of the battle. Wurie’s case, United States v. Brima Wurie, involves a flip phone (or “dumb” phone, if you’d prefer). Currently, police are able to search the person of an arrested individual: pockets, socks, etc. The frisking you’ve see on TV? Yeah, those. It’s called the “search incident to lawful arrest” doctrine. “The area into which he might reach, ” is the specific phrase used to allow this warrantless search, with the intention of preventing suspects from either reaching a weapon or destroying/hiding evidence. Pretty simple! “Make sure the arrested person doesn’t have a secret weapon and/or doesn’t destroy the evidence” is a solid argument for police to enact said search. In today’s hearings, information obtained from the cellphones of arrested individuals is at the heart of the matter. To search a cellphone, the law states that authorities must first obtain a search warrant. In both of today’s cases, the US government is arguing in favor of authorities being allowed to search arrestees phones without a warrant. The rulings of the two cases — however they’re decided — will be comprehensive in the context of available phone technology. The rulings will not cover wearables, watches, or any other form of personal electronics that’s used for communication. WHY SHOULD I CARE? You’ve probably put it together already, but you should care because modern phones are more than just phones. They contain banking and medical information, location tracking, access to email, and tons of other info otherwise physically incapable of being kept on your person. In so many words: we’ve got little computers in our pockets and most of us allow those computers access to a mess of personal information. If authorities want to access your computer, it requires a warrant. Should the US government’s stance be upheld in these cases, the computer in your pocket could be searched without such a warrant. WHAT’S AT STAKE? There are big picture questions of personal freedoms at play here, as well as the rights of the arrested: Are smart phones considered phones or computers by the US legal system? Aren’t they both ? If you’re arrested and your phone is password-locked, are you obligated to release the password? Doesn’t the fourth amendment specifically protect the kind of information that US citizens keep on smart phones? WHAT’S THE ARGUMENT? In Riley’s case, he was convicted in California — based on evidence obtained from his smart phone — and the decision was upheld based on the aforementioned “search incident to lawful arrest” doctrine. In Wurie’s case, his case was overturned by the US First District Court of Appeals, which argued police aren’t legally allowed to search an arrestee’s phone without a warrant. That disparity in interpretation is the focal point of today’s two cases. WANT EVEN MORE? We sure hope you do, because this one’s dense and there’s plenty of legal minutia to dig through (if you’re into that kinda thing). First up, the SCOTUS Blog has a great, lengthy recap of both trials and an argument preview right here . The New York Times also has a piece breaking down more of the case, such as the impact of signal-blocking Faraday bags on the technical arguments. Should the police be able to search a person’s phone without a warrant? Filed under: Cellphones , Software , Mobile Comments Source: United Stats v Wurie , Riley v California

Read the original:
What you need to know to keep the Feds out of your phone

FCC Proposes $48,000 Fine To Man Jamming Cellphones On Florida Interstate

New submitter freddieb writes: “An individual who had been jamming cellphone traffic on interstate 4 in Florida was located by FCC agents with the assistance of Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Deputies. The individual had reportedly been jamming cellphone traffic on I-4 for two years. The FCC is now proposing a $48, 000 fine for his actions. They say the jamming ‘could and may have had disastrous consequences by precluding the use of cell phones to reach life-saving 9-1-1 services provided by police, ambulance, and fire departments.'” Read more of this story at Slashdot.

More here:
FCC Proposes $48,000 Fine To Man Jamming Cellphones On Florida Interstate