‘Deus Ex: Mankind Divided’ betrayed by leaked screenshots (update)

The next game in Square Enix’s futuristic action franchise, Deus Ex , is called Mankind Divided , and it’s in development for PC, Xbox One and PS4. A slew of photos and information today found its way to a Russian site and, of course, NeoGAF , depicting new Deus Ex environments and series star Adam Jensen. Game Informer revealed Mankind Divided as its May cover story shortly after the leak. This week, Square Enix has been teasing a new game on Twitch and other social media platforms using the moniker “Can’t Kill Progress, ” and it had planned to reveal the new game on April 9th. Update: The latest tweet invites us to tune in tomorrow at noon (ET) to see “the future of Deus Ex .” There’s no official release date for Mankind Divided , though the GI summary says that it’s set in 2029, two years after the events of Deus Ex: Human Revolution . Square Enix filed a European trademark for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided in March 2014. In October 2013, Eidos Montreal head David Anfossi noted that his team was working on a sequel to Deus Ex: Human Revolution for Xbox One, PS4 and PC with the overarching theme of “trans-humanism segregation.” Come see the future of Deus Ex, tomorrow at 09:00PT/12:00ET/18:00CEST on http://t.co/cyr5xIE3fm . #CantKillProgress pic.twitter.com/bJS5Gf2gUu – Deus Ex (@DeusEx) April 7, 2015 Filed under: Gaming , HD Comments Source: NeoGAF , Kanobu , Game Informer

See original article:
‘Deus Ex: Mankind Divided’ betrayed by leaked screenshots (update)

Stanford’s aluminum battery fully charges in just one minute

Lithium-ion batteries have been a boon for the modern world — they’ve replaced the heavier, single-use alkaline type in everything from wristwatches to jumbo jets. Unfortunately, these rechargeable cells are already struggling to keep up with our ever-increasing energy needs. But a new type of aluminum-ion battery developed at Stanford University is not only less explode-y than lithium, it can also be built at fraction of the price and recharges completely in just over a minute . Best of all, “our new battery won’t catch fire, even if you drill through it, ” Stanford chemistry professor Dai Hongjie boasted in a recent release . Unlike earlier aluminum batteries, which generally failed after only about 100 recharge cycles, Stanford’s prototype can cycle more than 7, 500 times without any capacity loss — 7.5 times longer than your average li-ion. The aluminum-ion cell isn’t perfect (yet) as it can only produce about 2 volts, far less than the 3.6V that lithium-ion an muster. Plus aluminum cells only carry 40 watts of electricity per kilogram compared to lithium’s 100 to 206 W/kg energy density. “Improving the cathode material could eventually increase the voltage and energy density, ” said Dai. “Otherwise, our battery has everything else you’d dream that a battery should have: inexpensive electrodes, good safety, high-speed charging, flexibility and long cycle life. I see this as a new battery in its early days. It’s quite exciting.” Filed under: Science Comments Via: PC World Source: Stanford University

Originally posted here:
Stanford’s aluminum battery fully charges in just one minute

Here’s how YouTube is making it easier to watch 4K video

It’s one thing to find 4K video , but it’s another thing to play it — the bandwidth needed to play high-quality 4K video could easily crush many home internet connections, let alone your mobile service. YouTube isn’t taking that challenge lying down, though. As the service explains, it has been encoding many videos in its newer VP9 format in recent months to make 4K more viable and improve the picture you see. The codec uses as little as half the bandwidth as the H.264 standard you see on many parts of the web, even as it bumps up the image quality by prioritizing sharp features and taking into account fast-moving elements in the footage, like water spray. The result is video that not only starts playing sooner (since it spends less time buffering), but runs at resolutions that your connection might not otherwise handle. Even if your internet access isn’t up to handling 4K, this could still make the difference between watching in HD versus blocky standard definition. The real question is whether or not your favorite apps and devices can handle it. Chrome, Firefox and a lot of recent hardware (such as the Galaxy S6 ) have native support, but there’s no guarantee that it’ll be ubiquitous — not with the industry’s H.265 standard competing for attention, anyway. Filed under: Internet , Google Comments

See more here:
Here’s how YouTube is making it easier to watch 4K video

Disney is pouring $250 million into a fantasy sports site

Disney apparently doesn’t think it’s enough to offer sports coverage through ESPN… it wants to fuel your fantasy leagues, too. Wall Street Journal sources report that the House that Walt Built is investing $250 million into DraftKings, a fantasy sports website that lets you play for real cash. The deal is believed to be all about complementing ESPN’s various platforms with ads and services are that both relevant and, of course, profitable. DraftKings is expected to spend $500 million on ESPN ads in the “coming years” — that’s a lot of money to reap from friendly rivalries and office pools. The pact wouldn’t completely lock out competitors like the Comcast-backed FanDuel, but they’d undoubtedly be left reeling by losing exposure on one of the largest sports networks. [Image credit: Christian Petersen/Getty Images] Filed under: Internet Comments Source: Wall Street Journal

Continued here:
Disney is pouring $250 million into a fantasy sports site

Google wants no-cost international roaming for its phone service

Google may not have grand ambitions for its upcoming cellular network , but the company could still have a few clever tricks up its sleeve. The Telegraph claims that Google is talking to wireless giant Hutchison Whampoa, the owner of Three ( and soon O2 ), about letting American customers roam at no extra cost on the foreign carrier’s networks. In other words, you could go on Instagram photo tours of places like Hong Kong or the UK without facing an outrageous phone bill when you get home. Neither of the companies are commenting, but Hutchison Whampoa would be a very logical partner. It already lets its customers roam in other countries (including the US) as if they were at home — in a way, a Google deal would simply be returning the favor. Filed under: Cellphones , Wireless , Mobile , Google Comments Via: CNET Source: The Telegraph

More:
Google wants no-cost international roaming for its phone service

Amazon’s grocery service stops delivering beer and wine

We hope you weren’t counting on AmazonFresh to stock up on alcohol for your next big party. GeekWire reports that beer and wine have vanished from the internet grocery service without either a warning or any indication as to whether or not the booze will return. We’ve reached out to Amazon for an explanation, but it’s possible that Amazon is simply playing it safe with regulations. Some states don’t allow alcohol delivery, and those that do (such as Amazon’s home state, Washington) have regulations that determine both who can make deliveries and how the goods reach your door. Whatever the reasons, you’re going to have to either switch to alternatives like Drizly or else get your adult beverages the old-fashioned way. [Image credit: Andrew Hitchcock, Flickr ] Filed under: Internet , Amazon Comments Source: GeekWire

View the original here:
Amazon’s grocery service stops delivering beer and wine

Jamstik+ is a backpack-friendly ‘smart guitar’

The first time I encountered Jamstik, a guitar controller for Mac and iOS, was at CES 2013 . Zivix — the team behind the product — came to our trailer and gave us a demo. That was a prototype, which eventually got crowdfunded and did pretty well as history tells it. Now there’s Jamstik+ with a few significant improvements, and once again, the company’s looking to you to fund it (spoiler: It’s already met its goal). While the original Jamstik won people over, concerns over latency left some users wanting. Has version 2.0 cracked it? First, a quick recap for those that missed Jamstik last time around. Zivix calls it a “smart guitar.” I’d call it a MIDI controller (that looks like a guitar). It has strings, frets and shares lots of other DNA with a regular guitar. On its own, it makes no sound — you’ll need a Mac or iOS device for that. The neck is short (like, only-five-frets short), and the small body makes it lightweight and portable. The “smart” part comes from the fact that you “play” Jamstik via apps and software, opening up a host of sounds and creative possibilities not open to your dad’s beloved Fender. The main difference with the new Jamstik is a hexaphonic magnetic pickup, something Zivix says gives the strings a more natural feel, and delivers a higher-resolution signal compared to the original’s piezo-based method. The second important change is the move from WiFi to Bluetooth 4.0 wireless connectivity. Zivix claims this makes Jamstik the first guitar controller to be compatible with apps that support Apple’s Bluetooth LE MIDI implementation. It also means it’s a little bit easier to set up — at least in my opinion, compared to setting up local WiFi connections. There’s also a USB connection for both charging and connecting to a PC. Once set up, the free “Jam Tutor” app contains a series of interactive lessons that walk newbies through everything from plucking strings to playing chords. There’s even a little Guitar Hero -esque game where you play the tune for real. If you’re already competent with a guitar, Jamstik is the ideal way to play MIDI synths and apps in a way you’re already comfortable with. This includes controlling virtual instruments in full-fat music-production software like Logic or Ableton. I’ve dabbled with bass and 12-string acoustics over the years, but I’d currently fit in the beginner category. Within less than a minute of connecting Jamstik+ to an iPad, I was pretty into it. It’s undeniably cool. As for the lessons? They’re fun, but don’t be fooled, it’s just as hard playing on Jamstik as the real thing. If you’ve every waded through sheets of guitar tab and endless YouTube tutorials (where pros try to show you how easy it is), you’ll know how frustrating that can be. Interactive apps like Jam Tutor turn learning into an interactive game, which is much more compelling — to me at least. Even with my limited experience, I found the strings don’t quite feel like the real deal. They’re close, but a little too taught. You can loosen them, but because they’re shorter, the subtle differences in physics are always going to make them play differently. The stout neck also takes some getting used to. You still have access to a full range of notes though — buttons on the side shift the fretboard up and down the scales. The main problem I found was the timing detection on the apps. In some lessons on Jam Tutor, you pick notes as they cross the line (a la Guitar Hero ). I found myself intuitively playing earlier than the software wanted. The note sounded instantly, so it wasn’t latency — perhaps the programming of the app? Similarly, the software sometimes detected I played a string when I hadn’t (or vice versa). This is possibly down to my hand/finger placement, and was only noticeable in Jam Tutor (not GarageBand, for example). If you already have a Jamstik, your motivation to upgrade hangs on whether the convenience of Bluetooth (and by extension, Bluetooth MIDI) or the new pickup directly addresses any pain points or wish list items you have. One perks is you can keep your iPad connected to the internet, so in the future you could learn with friends, or jam online. The latency is definitely reduced on the Jamstik+, which is likely the real key selling point for many, but if any latency at all is a dealbreaker, you’ll still probably want to try this in-store first. Then of course there’s the question of price. Jamstik+ will cost $300 when it goes on sale. You can buy a pretty nice starter guitar for the same amount of money. It won’t play with apps, or be a MIDI controller, but if learning to play is your sole motivation, you’ll need to consider long and hard whether the benefits of the real thing outweigh the perks offered by Jamstik+. If you’re just looking for a MIDI controller to slip into your calloused, guitarist hands, then that price tag might not cause you quite as much deliberation. Either way, Jamstik was always a whole lot of fun, and the newest version only adds to that. The Kickstarter has already met its goal, but there’s still almost a month left to go. Estimated shipping for the first wave is June 2015. If you’re a lefty and feeling left out, we asked Zivix on your behalf. The team says it’s in the works… but no date yet. Filed under: Handhelds , Wireless Comments Source: Kickstarter

Read more here:
Jamstik+ is a backpack-friendly ‘smart guitar’

BMW will make plug-in versions of all new models

BMW only promised to build plug-in options for its core models back in December, but it looks like the company’s expanding that initiative to include future releases, as well. “With the introduction of every new model, there will be a plug-in hybrid version of that, too, ” BMW North America CEO Ludwig Willisch told Autoblog in an interview. Makes sense, considering the company mentioned before that its plug-in tech can fit into any of its vehicles. Willisch also squashed rumors of a BMW i5/i7 plug-in hybrid, which is supposed to be a direct Tesla Model S competitor, in the same interview held at the New York Auto Show. BMW doesn’t have a car like that, he told the publication, and even if the company is considering making it a reality, it won’t happen “any time soon.” It seems the company’s focusing on providing hybrid versions of its gas-powered Bimmers for now. Hopefully, they’re not substantially more expensive than their less eco-friendly counterparts. Filed under: Transportation Comments Source: Autoblog

View original post here:
BMW will make plug-in versions of all new models

HP Spectre x360 review: What happens when Microsoft helps build a laptop?

The Spectre x360 is HP’s newest flagship notebook. It’s also probably the closest you’ll get to seeing Microsoft build its own laptop. You see, though the machine has Hewlett-Packard’s name on it, HP designed it in close collaboration with engineers from the Windows team, optimizing everything from the fan noise to the screen’s color gamut. The result is a well-built laptop with fast performance, long battery life and a nearly bloatware-free version of Windows. And at $900 to start, it undercuts almost all of its rivals. Is there anything not to like? Hardware HP and Microsoft may have designed one of my new favorite laptops, but they hardly reinvented the wheel in the process. In fact, I think the pair owes at least a little credit to Lenovo, and maybe Apple, too. Think I’m trolling? Consider the evidence. As its name suggests, the x360 has a 360-degree hinge similar to Lenovo’s Yoga series that allows the screen to fold back into tablet mode (and Tent Mode, and Stand Mode — yep, HP even stole Lenovo’s names for its different usage modes). Then there’s the design. Like the MacBook Air, the x360 is fashioned out of unibody, CNC-machined aluminum, with a wedge-shaped profile that tapers subtly from back to front. It’s not a wholesale copy-job, to be sure, but the machine’s resemblance to a Mac is unmistakable. HP and Microsoft owe at least a little credit to Lenovo, and maybe Apple, too. Still, HP managed to improve on what’s otherwise a tried-and-true formula. Take the hinge, for instance. Though it feels as smooth and controlled as anything Lenovo ever produced, HP’s version uses a different kind of mechanism that “folds into itself” (to quote what I was told when I first saw it). This allows the machine to be equally thick regardless of whether the screen is in tablet mode or folded shut, like a regular notebook. Speaking of thickness, the machine measures 15.9mm (or 0.63 inch), with the weight coming in at a relatively heavy 1.44kg, or 3.17 pounds on the Quad HD model. In fact, the x360 is actually 3.26 pounds on the full HD version (one panel is thinner than the other). Either way, it feels noticeably denser than a typical 13-inch Ultrabook, and it’s definitely heavier than the super-light Yoga 3 Pro . That’s irrelevant if you plan to park it on your desk and use it in Stand or Tent mode to watch movies, and it doesn’t even really matter when you use the thing as a regular notebook — it’s still easy to tote around in your backpack or shoulder bag. What you might find, though, is that a relatively large, 13-inch PC like this, particularly one this heavy, isn’t well-suited for tablet mode. If you do choose to use it that way, I suggest resting it on your lap; holding up a three-plus-pound device gets tiresome after exactly five seconds. On the plus side, at least, a slightly bulkier machine means fewer compromises when it comes to ports. On board, we have three USB 3.0 connections, along with a full-sized HDMI socket, a Mini DisplayPort, an SD card slot, a headphone jack and a volume rocker, for use in tablet mode. That’s no small thing at a time when some laptop makers are trying to get away with including just one port. Finally, HP sells Ethernet and HDMI-to-VGA adapters for $30 apiece. (In my first look , I initially said they came in the box, but that’s not true; HP just included them gratis for us reviewers.) In addition to that lie-flat hinge, the keyboard and trackpad are also entirely HP’s — and in some ways they’re better than the competition, too. The metal buttons have a similar spacious, island-style layout as many rival machines, except the keys have a full 1.5mm of travel, making them much cushier than what I’m used to on Ultrabooks. (Perhaps this is one benefit to having a slightly thicker machine: less of a reason to settle for a flat, lifeless keyboard.) In addition, I appreciate how relatively quiet the buttons are, even despite their springiness. Also, most of the keys are large enough that I can find them by feel, without having to worry about hitting the wrong one. Even the arrow keys — some of the few shrunken buttons here — were easy to get to when I wanted to highlight text. What’s funny is that although HP teamed up with Microsoft on this, it didn’t use one of Microsoft’s own “Precision” touchpads ; instead, it went with a clickpad from Synaptics. Make that an extra-wide clickpad — the trackpad here has much the same elongated shape as on the Spectre 13 , HP’s last-generation flagship. When that model first came out, the idea was that people could use so-called touch zones on either end of the trackpad to more easily pull off certain gestures specific to Windows 8 — you know, like swiping in from the right to expose the Charms Bar. As it happens, the Charms Bar is about to go away in Windows 10 (set to launch in a few months) and so, there are no touch zones here, per se; just one really wide touchpad. HP figured, even if you don’t need those zones anymore, you might still enjoy having the extra horizontal space. I have to say I do. In general, the touchpad is reliable; the cursor almost always goes where I intended, and multitouch gestures like two-finger scrolls work well, too. I would prefer a slightly lower-friction touch surface, but if a little more drag means more accurate tracking, then that’s fine. Better that than a smooth touchpad that doesn’t actually do what I want it to. The x360 comes standard with a 1080p, optically bonded touchscreen, but is also offered with a 2, 560 x 1, 440 panel for an extra hundred bucks. Unfortunately, I’ve only had the chance to test the full HD edition, so I can’t tell you firsthand just how pixel-dense the Quad HD option is. But I think I can guess, and I bet you can too. If you think the 13-inch MacBook Pro’s 2, 560 x 1, 600 display is gorgeous, you will probably appreciate this as well. As it is, I didn’t find myself pining for the sharper panel, especially considering how great the battery life is when you settle for the lower resolution. Thanks to a 72 percent color gamut, the tones here are nice and rich, though not overly saturated. Also, though the viewing angles on this IPS screen aren’t perfect, they’re wide enough that I could still watch movies and get work done with the screen dipped forward, within a certain range of flexibility. As for audio, the dual speakers on the laptop’s bottom side exhibit some of the tinniness I’ve come to expect from notebooks, but it’s no worse than what I’ve observed on other machines. Performance and battery life PCMark7 3DMark06 3DMark11 ATTO (top disk speeds) HP Spectre x360 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) 4, 965 8, 810 E1, 667 / P932 / X265 555 MB/s (reads); 270 MB/s (writes) Dell XPS 13 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) 4, 900 7, 433 E2, 114 / P1, 199 / X330 515 MB/s (reads); 455 MB/s (writes) Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro (1.1GHz Intel M-5Y70, Intel HD 5300) 4, 699 4, 734 E1, 076 / P595 / X175 554 MB/s (reads); 261 MB/s (writes) Samsung ATIV Book 9 2014 Edition (1.6GHz Core i5-4200U, Intel HD 4400) 4, 835 5, 947 E1, 752 / P948 / X297 551 MB/s (reads); 141 MB/s (writes) Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (1.9GHz Core i5-4300U, Intel HD 4400) 5, 024 5, 053 E1, 313 / P984 555 MB/s (reads); 252 MB/s (writes) Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus (1.6GHz Core i5-4200U, Intel HD 4400) 4, 973 5, 611 E1, 675 / P867 / X277 547 MB/s (reads); 508 MB/s (writes) Acer Aspire S7-392 (1.6GHz Intel Core i5-4200U, Intel HD 4400) 5, 108 5, 158 E1, 724 / P952 / X298 975 MB/s (reads); 1.1 GB/s (writes) Like so many other laptops coming out around now, the Spectre x360 makes use of Intel’s new fifth-generation Core processors, code-named ” Broadwell .” In fact, the configuration I tested had the same 2.2GHz dual-core Core i5-5200 chip and 8GB as the Dell XPS 13 , except paired with a different solid-state drive. Unsurprisingly, then, I observed mostly the same fast performance, including speedy seven-second boot-ups and resume times of less than a second. The benchmarks back this up too, with scores that largely match the XPS 13 (though the jury seems to be out on which is the graphics champ). Wireless performance is another area where HP and Microsoft put their heads together. The machine makes use of a 2×2 802.11ac WiFi radio, though the two companies claim it has stronger range than even similarly configured systems, with wireless throughput not dropping off as quickly in either the 2.4GHz or 5GHz bands. I’m not equipped to test that in any sort of scientific way, but I can say that wireless streaming was fast and reliable, and that the machine was also quick to reconnect after coming out of sleep. If there’s one area where the x360 trails its peers, it’s disk speeds. Though it does indeed come standard with an SSD (a Samsung-made one, in my case), these are of the slower mSATA variety — not PCIe-based disks like we’re used to seeing on other flagship laptops. That means while its peak read speeds of 555 MB/s are quite healthy, its max writes of 270 MB/s are relatively low. On some rival machines, you might see writes in the 500-and-something-megabytes-per-second range, and then there are outliers like the new 13-inch MacBook Pro , which delivered 1.3 GB/s reads and 643.6 MB/s write speeds. Again, none of that seems to have a negative effect on things like boot and app-load times, but depending on what you’re doing and how hard you push the system, you may wish you had some faster transfer speeds. Battery life HP Spectre x360 11:34 MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) 12:51 Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) 11:23 Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, late 2013) 11:18 Chromebook Pixel (2015) 10:01 Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus 8:44 Dell XPS 13 (2015) 7:36 Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 7:36 Acer Aspire S7-392 7:33 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 7:08 HP rates the x360 for up to 12.5 hours of runtime, depending on the configuration (meaning: The lower-res model lasts longest). Part of that’s thanks to a large, 56Wh battery, but HP and Microsoft also pored over the system settings, looking for places where they could make the machine just a little more power efficient. Together, they decided to shut down certain parts of the system when not in use, including the sensors in the hinge that tell the x360 what mode it’s in. They also aimed for low fan noise, in part to conserve juice (and I think they succeeded there). Meanwhile, the Quad HD panel uses PSR ( Panel Self Refresh ) technology, which avoids changing pixels unnecessarily to reduce power consumption. After speaking with an HP spokesperson, it’s clear that the QHD model still doesn’t get quite the same battery life as the 1080p edition, but perhaps details like that at least help close the gap. Again, I didn’t test the higher-res version, so I can’t say firsthand. All of this is to say, the battery life really is as long as promised. On the unit I tested, which had a 1080p screen, I very nearly made it to the half-day mark — 11 hours and 34 minutes of video playback, to be precise. In fact, were it not for my aggressive test settings (WiFi on with brightness fixed at 65 percent), the machine would have lasted even longer. Either way, 11.5 hours is an excellent showing for a laptop this size. The only one we’ve tested that does better is the MacBook Air. Otherwise, the Spectre x360 manages to slightly edge out the new 13-inch MacBook Pro, which is in a similar weight class. HP’s flagship also far surpasses plenty of lighter-weight Ultrabooks — machines like the Yoga 3 Pro, Acer Aspire S7 , the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus and Dell’s new XPS 13. The Spectre x360 might be heavier than all those systems, but it at least justifies its extra heft with longer runtime. Software Given that Microsoft helped design the x360, it’s fair to assume it also runs a relatively clean version of Windows. The operative word being “relatively.” My test machine came with Netflix and The Weather Channel, as well as Hearts Deluxe and a few of HP’s own apps, like Connected Photo. It also includes a free one-year subscription to McAfee’s LiveSafe service. That security coverage is actually pretty useful, though McAfee’s desktop pop-ups can be quite annoying (seriously, does it ever learn?). In any case, that little bit of bloatware disqualifies it from being one of Microsoft’s Signature Series machine, but it’s a clean build nonetheless — definitely the cleanest I’ve seen from HP. Additionally, it should go without saying, but the Spectre x360 ships with Windows 8.1, and, like other Windows 8.1 machines, will be eligible for a free upgrade to Windows 10 when it comes out later this year. What’s unique in this case is that because HP worked so closely with Microsoft, the x360 is perhaps better optimized for Windows than some of its competitors. For now, most of that optimization has centered on Windows 8.1, but representatives from both camps have indicated to me that after the x360 went on sale, they’d be shifting their engineering resources to focus more on Win 10. Configuration options The Spectre x360 is currently offered in three configurations, priced at $900, $1, 150 and $1, 400. Starting with the entry-level model, you get the same Core i5-5200U processor I tested here, along with 4GB of RAM and a 1080p touchscreen. Of the three, this is the only one that’s customizable, with options to double the RAM ($50), add a Quad HD screen ($100) or upgrade to a dual-core i7 processor ($150). You can also swap out the standard 128GB SSD for a 256GB one ($50) or a 512GB disk ($200). Moving on, the $1, 150 model keeps the 1, 920 x 1, 080 display, but steps up to a Core i7 CPU, 8GB of memory and 256GB of storage. Finally, there’s the top-of-the-line $1, 400 model, which has a higher-res 2, 560 x 1, 440 screen and a 512GB SSD (in addition to a Core i7 CPU and 8GB of RAM). That’s currently sold out on HP’s site, but a company spokesperson says it should be back in stock within the coming weeks. Either way, if you were doing the math earlier, you saw that configuring the base $900 model with tricked-out specs comes to the same price of $1, 400, so really, it’s not actually “out of stock”; you just have to check off more boxes to get it. The competition I’ve read other tech writers refer to the HP Spectre x360 as a “MacBook Air competitor.” That’s fair, but also a little lazy: It’s a MacBook Air competitor to the extent that every Windows Ultrabook is. The point is, if it’s a thin-and-light, high-end laptop you’re looking for, you’ve got lots of options. Too many options, almost. For the sake of not overwhelming you, let’s just focus on the best. Perhaps the most direct comparison would be to the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro ($1, 249-plus), which also has a 360-degree hinge and flagship specs. At just 2.6 pounds and half an inch thick, it is insanely thin and light, especially for a laptop with a touchscreen and a convertible design. That said, that thinness and lightness come with a couple trade-offs. For one, that compact design is only possible thanks to one of Intel’s lower-power Core M processors , which, while perfectly adequate for basic tasks, is not as robust as a fifth-gen Core CPU. Two, there isn’t much room for a big battery inside that slim chassis. Indeed, the battery life falls four hours short of what you’ll get on the Spectre x360, though it admittedly isn’t much better than other skinny Ultrabooks. If you can live without a convertible design, your options become even more plentiful. Our new favorite is the Dell XPS 13 ($800-plus), which crams a 13-inch display into the body of an 11-inch machine, making it way more compact than other machines with the same screen size. At 2.6 pounds, it too is very light for a touchscreen system, and we’re fans of its comfy keyboard, fast performance, vibrant screen and surprisingly good audio. My main gripes are that the battery life is merely average, at least if you configure it with a touchscreen, and that if you do want a touch panel, it costs an extra $500. That’s because the only touchscreen option has 3, 200 x 1, 800 resolution; you can’t get it with a full HD touch panel, like with the Spectre x360. A shame, that. Other solid options include the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus ($1, 299 and up) and the skinny Acer Aspire S7-393 ($1, 300), both of which have been updated with Intel’s new fifth-gen Core processors. Lastly, yes, there’s the 13-inch MacBook Air , which starts at $999. This, too, was recently refreshed with Intel’s Broadwell CPUs, with the battery life still rated for up to 12 hours. As ever, we enjoy the aluminum design (though it’s slightly heavier than the competition, at 2.96 pounds), as well as the keyboard and best-in-class trackpad. The biggest trade-off you’ll make here is the screen quality: It’s the only laptop in the Mac lineup that doesn’t have a Retina display; just 1, 440 x 900 on the 13-inch model. Wrap-up I asked at the beginning of this review if there’s anything not to like about the Spectre x360. Indeed there is: the machine’s relative heaviness. At three-plus pounds, it’s hardly a clunker, but it is noticeably weightier than other 13-inch machines. Curiously, though, that weight also makes possible so many of the things I like about the laptop. Because the x360 is slightly bulkier than its rivals, it can accommodate a cushier keyboard and a bigger battery, allowing for nearly best-in-class runtime. It also makes room for a ton of ports. If you’re shopping in this size class, I’d also suggest you consider a few other models, like the lighter-weight Dell XPS 13, but even then, the specs HP offers for the money are hard to beat. Particularly if you prefer something with a more convertible design, the x360 is a strong — and reasonably priced — choice. Filed under: Laptops , Microsoft , HP Comments

Original post:
HP Spectre x360 review: What happens when Microsoft helps build a laptop?

Dish brings over 200 international channels to Sling TV

As of today, Dish Network’s on-demand international service has a new name: Sling International . Formerly known as DishWorld, it consists of more than 200 international channels spanning 18 languages. Packages start at $15, and not surprisingly, you’ll be able to access it through the Sling TV apps, or through a new Sling International app. Given the solid launch for Sling TV, Dish’s $20 digital TV service , it makes sense for the company to consolidate its on-demand offerings. It also makes Sling TV seem more and more like a traditional subscription TV offering — which is great for people who demand plenty of choice. “Sling TV grew from the foundation established by DishWorld, enabling us to test, grow and perfect our OTT capabilities through a service that streams tens of millions of hours of content every month, ” Sling TV CEO Roger Lynch said in a statement. While Dish managed to be the first company to roll out a significant on-demand TV service, we’re also hearing that Apple is planning to unveil its own service later this year (likely along with some new Apple TV devices). Together with Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon’s streaming video and HBO Now, 2015 may end up being the year more people consider dumping their traditional cable subscriptions. But of course, they’ll just be exchanging one massive subscription for a bunch of cheaper ones. Filed under: HD Comments Source: Sling

Visit link:
Dish brings over 200 international channels to Sling TV