There’s no longer a place like PlayStation Home

PlayStation Home, Sony’s answer to the Second Life question no one asked, was never where the company’s heart lived. Maybe its greasy, suppurating id lived in those gleaming neon halls, somewhere between the bowling alley full of dead-eyed polygon people and the virtual shopping mall. You know the PlayStation Home shopping mall I’m talking about. It’s the one where you could spend very real money on an entirely fake golden statue of a robot lady with impossibly proportioned breasts. After seven years, the majority of which were spent in beta testing, Sony closed Home’s doors this week. The PlayStation heart is secure elsewhere, for sure, but the shuttering of Home does mark the conclusion of an experiment true to the PlayStation soul, as well as the end of the brand’s darkest era. When Home was conceived in 2006, the PlayStation brand was nose-diving hard after enjoying more than a decade of market dominance. By the time the Game Developers Conference took place in March 2007, Sony was in sore need of good will after the PlayStation 3’s miserable release in November 2006. In the span of just a few months, the company with the best-selling home console of all time — the PlayStation 2 — became a laughing stock to both consumers galled by the PS3’s high price and developers turned off by its notoriously finicky architecture. At GDC that spring, game makers were buzzing about everything but PlayStation. Xbox 360 was coming into its own after its first year, thanks in part to ease of development and the booming popularity of Xbox Live; Nintendo Wii wasn’t even six months old and already a phenomenon with everyone from toddlers to octogenarians; and just two months earlier Apple had unveiled this curious touchscreen device called iPhone that had small devs intrigued with new possibilities. Seemingly no one wanted to talk about Sony’s lumbering $600 console that seemingly had no vision for connecting people online. Sony did have a vision, though; a hell of a vision based on its invigorating presentation that GDC. The bright, bubbly arts-and-crafts fantasia of LittleBigPlanet , which would let people make their very own game levels and share them online, was just half of what Sony envisioned as a more physical (in the virtual reality sense at least) answer to Xbox Live. The other pillar was going to be PlayStation Home, a platform whose debut had people both inside and outside of the industry genuinely excited. The PlayStation Home envisioned in that 2007 trailer was downright utopian: People would have their own apartment in a vast virtual space that looked as open and malleable as Linden Lab’s still-growing Second Life , but without the rough edges. Even the avatars PS3 owners could make for themselves there would have the fashionable, smooth-lined sheen of a ’70s sci-fi flick like Silent Running . Rather than the anonymity of text, people would meet up in Home virtual face to virtual face and either play games right there — bowling, arcade games, billiards, etc. — or seamlessly dive from Home into bigger multiplayer games like Call of Duty . Sony even planned to have little themed clubrooms for specific games. Want to talk with your friends about strategy before playing aerial combat game Warhawk ? Meet in the Warhawk room after shopping for avatar T-shirts and flirting with people outside. It’ll be just like the little computer world of the ’90s cartoon ReBoot , only sexy and stylish and modern! PlayStation Home in its presentable ideal form. Even before PlayStation Home was wracked by delays — the beta didn’t launch until 21 months after that GDC debut — and the technological failings of both the PS3 itself and Sony’s PlayStation Network, it was doomed to fail. The entire concept betrayed a fundamental misunderstanding of how social networks and social technologies were evolving as the aughts wound down. The cumbersome divisions and eyesore layouts of Myspace were already yielding to the more fluid, interconnected tapestry of interactions on Facebook. Meanwhile, Microsoft was focusing on invisible back-end technology for letting people play video games online together, making ease of use and accessibility top priority for its audience. Text and a minimum of tinkering were the interfaces of choice for people connecting over the internet. Making a doll body to wander around a bunch of shiny virtual plazas just so you could chat with friends and play some freaking SOCOM wasn’t just unnecessary; it was counterproductive. While Home never grew into the bustling fake metropolis Sony wanted it to be, it did unexpectedly grow both populated and profitable. Just how inconvenient Home would turn out to be as a gaming social network, or even as just a fun thing to use, didn’t become clear until the beta version opened for business at the end of 2008 . Impossibly slow to use, prone to frequent crashes and adding an infuriating layer to the already cumbersome process of playing games online with PS3, the only original promise Home delivered in its first version was making a virtual space for avatars to hang out and talk to one another. You could at least do that, albeit using the awkward on-screen PS3 keyboard to type out clipped messages. You could also make your avatar dance. If that sounds like an utterly dystopian realization of the initially utopian pitch for Home, the behavior of the average user at the time matched it. If you popped into a lobby with a female avatar, getting mobbed by other dancing avatars wanting to chat you up was common enough to birth the original Home prank: Quincying . Those with long memories might recall Quincying as the art of making two avatars, one a young woman to lure in trolls and a second that looks like a hipster version of Sweetums from The Muppet Show . When the troll arrives, turn into the second and start dancing. Home was a weird place. Over the next few years, even as Sony slowly delivered the features it initially envisioned, like themed spaces tied to specific games or a virtual lobby for people to see announcements from E3, it still struggled with basic usability. Home would update, but it would still crash your PlayStation . Virtual sexual harassment, sluggish performance and an overall lack of utility should have quickly rendered it a wasteland. Yet it didn’t. While Home never grew into the bustling fake metropolis Sony wanted it to be, it did unexpectedly grow both populated and profitable. Sodium ‘s Golden Vickie statue is just one of the strange items for sale in Home. Sony never committed to sharing comprehensive data on Home, preferring to instead focus on how many people had installed and used it at least once. (Of note, 19 million people used it for an average of 70 minutes as of early 2011 according to Sony’s GDC address that year and ” tens of millions ” as of its closure announcement last fall.) All the while, brands like Audi and Cartoon Network continued to produce virtual items for Home like avatar T-shirts and other tchotchkes that people bought with cold, hard cash. Part of the reason businesses remained interested was the small, devoted and willing-to-spend user group in Home. Lockwood’s game Sodium , a Home exclusive, offered the first five levels for free and 45 more only available if you bought a T-shirt for your avatar. A solid 25 percent of users bought that T-shirt according to Home director Peter Edward. That’s just one of the things Home’s mercurial users spent money on. Sodium users could also buy this golden statue of a busty robot lady ; a statue that served no other purpose than to be a statue. Home didn’t work, and it certainly didn’t pump blood through the PlayStation body, but it was fascinating to inhabit all the same. This is the sort of thing left behind with PlayStation Home’s closure, an unexpected mixture of failed ambition and surprising financial success. With Sony’s eyes turned toward entertainment on PlayStation 4, with its IPTV service PlayStation Vue and streaming game service PlayStation Now, the shuttering of Home this past Monday seems like the inevitable end of the virtual space dream. Will Sony’s virtual reality tech Project Morpheus and other headgear like Oculus Rift bring it back around? Maybe, but that will depend on the average consumer embracing it and the jury is out on whether or not that’ll happen. PlayStation Home’s legacy is as a bizarre experiment, an attempt to embrace the sort of internet socialization envisioned in science fiction novels like Snow Crash and pulp garbage like Hackers . Home undeniably had its own rhythm, though. There was a tangible vibe born of Home’s residents stiffly milling about its public squares and awkwardly gyrating whenever someone new logged in. It wasn’t the beat of life by any means, but it was definitely distinct. Home didn’t work, and it certainly didn’t pump blood through the PlayStation body, but it was fascinating to inhabit all the same. [Image credits: SCEA] Filed under: Gaming , HD , Sony Comments

More:
There’s no longer a place like PlayStation Home

BMW will make plug-in versions of all new models

BMW only promised to build plug-in options for its core models back in December, but it looks like the company’s expanding that initiative to include future releases, as well. “With the introduction of every new model, there will be a plug-in hybrid version of that, too, ” BMW North America CEO Ludwig Willisch told Autoblog in an interview. Makes sense, considering the company mentioned before that its plug-in tech can fit into any of its vehicles. Willisch also squashed rumors of a BMW i5/i7 plug-in hybrid, which is supposed to be a direct Tesla Model S competitor, in the same interview held at the New York Auto Show. BMW doesn’t have a car like that, he told the publication, and even if the company is considering making it a reality, it won’t happen “any time soon.” It seems the company’s focusing on providing hybrid versions of its gas-powered Bimmers for now. Hopefully, they’re not substantially more expensive than their less eco-friendly counterparts. Filed under: Transportation Comments Source: Autoblog

View original post here:
BMW will make plug-in versions of all new models

HP Spectre x360 review: What happens when Microsoft helps build a laptop?

The Spectre x360 is HP’s newest flagship notebook. It’s also probably the closest you’ll get to seeing Microsoft build its own laptop. You see, though the machine has Hewlett-Packard’s name on it, HP designed it in close collaboration with engineers from the Windows team, optimizing everything from the fan noise to the screen’s color gamut. The result is a well-built laptop with fast performance, long battery life and a nearly bloatware-free version of Windows. And at $900 to start, it undercuts almost all of its rivals. Is there anything not to like? Hardware HP and Microsoft may have designed one of my new favorite laptops, but they hardly reinvented the wheel in the process. In fact, I think the pair owes at least a little credit to Lenovo, and maybe Apple, too. Think I’m trolling? Consider the evidence. As its name suggests, the x360 has a 360-degree hinge similar to Lenovo’s Yoga series that allows the screen to fold back into tablet mode (and Tent Mode, and Stand Mode — yep, HP even stole Lenovo’s names for its different usage modes). Then there’s the design. Like the MacBook Air, the x360 is fashioned out of unibody, CNC-machined aluminum, with a wedge-shaped profile that tapers subtly from back to front. It’s not a wholesale copy-job, to be sure, but the machine’s resemblance to a Mac is unmistakable. HP and Microsoft owe at least a little credit to Lenovo, and maybe Apple, too. Still, HP managed to improve on what’s otherwise a tried-and-true formula. Take the hinge, for instance. Though it feels as smooth and controlled as anything Lenovo ever produced, HP’s version uses a different kind of mechanism that “folds into itself” (to quote what I was told when I first saw it). This allows the machine to be equally thick regardless of whether the screen is in tablet mode or folded shut, like a regular notebook. Speaking of thickness, the machine measures 15.9mm (or 0.63 inch), with the weight coming in at a relatively heavy 1.44kg, or 3.17 pounds on the Quad HD model. In fact, the x360 is actually 3.26 pounds on the full HD version (one panel is thinner than the other). Either way, it feels noticeably denser than a typical 13-inch Ultrabook, and it’s definitely heavier than the super-light Yoga 3 Pro . That’s irrelevant if you plan to park it on your desk and use it in Stand or Tent mode to watch movies, and it doesn’t even really matter when you use the thing as a regular notebook — it’s still easy to tote around in your backpack or shoulder bag. What you might find, though, is that a relatively large, 13-inch PC like this, particularly one this heavy, isn’t well-suited for tablet mode. If you do choose to use it that way, I suggest resting it on your lap; holding up a three-plus-pound device gets tiresome after exactly five seconds. On the plus side, at least, a slightly bulkier machine means fewer compromises when it comes to ports. On board, we have three USB 3.0 connections, along with a full-sized HDMI socket, a Mini DisplayPort, an SD card slot, a headphone jack and a volume rocker, for use in tablet mode. That’s no small thing at a time when some laptop makers are trying to get away with including just one port. Finally, HP sells Ethernet and HDMI-to-VGA adapters for $30 apiece. (In my first look , I initially said they came in the box, but that’s not true; HP just included them gratis for us reviewers.) In addition to that lie-flat hinge, the keyboard and trackpad are also entirely HP’s — and in some ways they’re better than the competition, too. The metal buttons have a similar spacious, island-style layout as many rival machines, except the keys have a full 1.5mm of travel, making them much cushier than what I’m used to on Ultrabooks. (Perhaps this is one benefit to having a slightly thicker machine: less of a reason to settle for a flat, lifeless keyboard.) In addition, I appreciate how relatively quiet the buttons are, even despite their springiness. Also, most of the keys are large enough that I can find them by feel, without having to worry about hitting the wrong one. Even the arrow keys — some of the few shrunken buttons here — were easy to get to when I wanted to highlight text. What’s funny is that although HP teamed up with Microsoft on this, it didn’t use one of Microsoft’s own “Precision” touchpads ; instead, it went with a clickpad from Synaptics. Make that an extra-wide clickpad — the trackpad here has much the same elongated shape as on the Spectre 13 , HP’s last-generation flagship. When that model first came out, the idea was that people could use so-called touch zones on either end of the trackpad to more easily pull off certain gestures specific to Windows 8 — you know, like swiping in from the right to expose the Charms Bar. As it happens, the Charms Bar is about to go away in Windows 10 (set to launch in a few months) and so, there are no touch zones here, per se; just one really wide touchpad. HP figured, even if you don’t need those zones anymore, you might still enjoy having the extra horizontal space. I have to say I do. In general, the touchpad is reliable; the cursor almost always goes where I intended, and multitouch gestures like two-finger scrolls work well, too. I would prefer a slightly lower-friction touch surface, but if a little more drag means more accurate tracking, then that’s fine. Better that than a smooth touchpad that doesn’t actually do what I want it to. The x360 comes standard with a 1080p, optically bonded touchscreen, but is also offered with a 2, 560 x 1, 440 panel for an extra hundred bucks. Unfortunately, I’ve only had the chance to test the full HD edition, so I can’t tell you firsthand just how pixel-dense the Quad HD option is. But I think I can guess, and I bet you can too. If you think the 13-inch MacBook Pro’s 2, 560 x 1, 600 display is gorgeous, you will probably appreciate this as well. As it is, I didn’t find myself pining for the sharper panel, especially considering how great the battery life is when you settle for the lower resolution. Thanks to a 72 percent color gamut, the tones here are nice and rich, though not overly saturated. Also, though the viewing angles on this IPS screen aren’t perfect, they’re wide enough that I could still watch movies and get work done with the screen dipped forward, within a certain range of flexibility. As for audio, the dual speakers on the laptop’s bottom side exhibit some of the tinniness I’ve come to expect from notebooks, but it’s no worse than what I’ve observed on other machines. Performance and battery life PCMark7 3DMark06 3DMark11 ATTO (top disk speeds) HP Spectre x360 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) 4, 965 8, 810 E1, 667 / P932 / X265 555 MB/s (reads); 270 MB/s (writes) Dell XPS 13 (2015, 2.2GHz Intel Core i5-5200U, Intel HD 5500) 4, 900 7, 433 E2, 114 / P1, 199 / X330 515 MB/s (reads); 455 MB/s (writes) Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro (1.1GHz Intel M-5Y70, Intel HD 5300) 4, 699 4, 734 E1, 076 / P595 / X175 554 MB/s (reads); 261 MB/s (writes) Samsung ATIV Book 9 2014 Edition (1.6GHz Core i5-4200U, Intel HD 4400) 4, 835 5, 947 E1, 752 / P948 / X297 551 MB/s (reads); 141 MB/s (writes) Microsoft Surface Pro 3 (1.9GHz Core i5-4300U, Intel HD 4400) 5, 024 5, 053 E1, 313 / P984 555 MB/s (reads); 252 MB/s (writes) Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus (1.6GHz Core i5-4200U, Intel HD 4400) 4, 973 5, 611 E1, 675 / P867 / X277 547 MB/s (reads); 508 MB/s (writes) Acer Aspire S7-392 (1.6GHz Intel Core i5-4200U, Intel HD 4400) 5, 108 5, 158 E1, 724 / P952 / X298 975 MB/s (reads); 1.1 GB/s (writes) Like so many other laptops coming out around now, the Spectre x360 makes use of Intel’s new fifth-generation Core processors, code-named ” Broadwell .” In fact, the configuration I tested had the same 2.2GHz dual-core Core i5-5200 chip and 8GB as the Dell XPS 13 , except paired with a different solid-state drive. Unsurprisingly, then, I observed mostly the same fast performance, including speedy seven-second boot-ups and resume times of less than a second. The benchmarks back this up too, with scores that largely match the XPS 13 (though the jury seems to be out on which is the graphics champ). Wireless performance is another area where HP and Microsoft put their heads together. The machine makes use of a 2×2 802.11ac WiFi radio, though the two companies claim it has stronger range than even similarly configured systems, with wireless throughput not dropping off as quickly in either the 2.4GHz or 5GHz bands. I’m not equipped to test that in any sort of scientific way, but I can say that wireless streaming was fast and reliable, and that the machine was also quick to reconnect after coming out of sleep. If there’s one area where the x360 trails its peers, it’s disk speeds. Though it does indeed come standard with an SSD (a Samsung-made one, in my case), these are of the slower mSATA variety — not PCIe-based disks like we’re used to seeing on other flagship laptops. That means while its peak read speeds of 555 MB/s are quite healthy, its max writes of 270 MB/s are relatively low. On some rival machines, you might see writes in the 500-and-something-megabytes-per-second range, and then there are outliers like the new 13-inch MacBook Pro , which delivered 1.3 GB/s reads and 643.6 MB/s write speeds. Again, none of that seems to have a negative effect on things like boot and app-load times, but depending on what you’re doing and how hard you push the system, you may wish you had some faster transfer speeds. Battery life HP Spectre x360 11:34 MacBook Air (13-inch, 2013) 12:51 Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, 2015) 11:23 Apple MacBook Pro with Retina display (13-inch, late 2013) 11:18 Chromebook Pixel (2015) 10:01 Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus 8:44 Dell XPS 13 (2015) 7:36 Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro 7:36 Acer Aspire S7-392 7:33 Microsoft Surface Pro 3 7:08 HP rates the x360 for up to 12.5 hours of runtime, depending on the configuration (meaning: The lower-res model lasts longest). Part of that’s thanks to a large, 56Wh battery, but HP and Microsoft also pored over the system settings, looking for places where they could make the machine just a little more power efficient. Together, they decided to shut down certain parts of the system when not in use, including the sensors in the hinge that tell the x360 what mode it’s in. They also aimed for low fan noise, in part to conserve juice (and I think they succeeded there). Meanwhile, the Quad HD panel uses PSR ( Panel Self Refresh ) technology, which avoids changing pixels unnecessarily to reduce power consumption. After speaking with an HP spokesperson, it’s clear that the QHD model still doesn’t get quite the same battery life as the 1080p edition, but perhaps details like that at least help close the gap. Again, I didn’t test the higher-res version, so I can’t say firsthand. All of this is to say, the battery life really is as long as promised. On the unit I tested, which had a 1080p screen, I very nearly made it to the half-day mark — 11 hours and 34 minutes of video playback, to be precise. In fact, were it not for my aggressive test settings (WiFi on with brightness fixed at 65 percent), the machine would have lasted even longer. Either way, 11.5 hours is an excellent showing for a laptop this size. The only one we’ve tested that does better is the MacBook Air. Otherwise, the Spectre x360 manages to slightly edge out the new 13-inch MacBook Pro, which is in a similar weight class. HP’s flagship also far surpasses plenty of lighter-weight Ultrabooks — machines like the Yoga 3 Pro, Acer Aspire S7 , the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus and Dell’s new XPS 13. The Spectre x360 might be heavier than all those systems, but it at least justifies its extra heft with longer runtime. Software Given that Microsoft helped design the x360, it’s fair to assume it also runs a relatively clean version of Windows. The operative word being “relatively.” My test machine came with Netflix and The Weather Channel, as well as Hearts Deluxe and a few of HP’s own apps, like Connected Photo. It also includes a free one-year subscription to McAfee’s LiveSafe service. That security coverage is actually pretty useful, though McAfee’s desktop pop-ups can be quite annoying (seriously, does it ever learn?). In any case, that little bit of bloatware disqualifies it from being one of Microsoft’s Signature Series machine, but it’s a clean build nonetheless — definitely the cleanest I’ve seen from HP. Additionally, it should go without saying, but the Spectre x360 ships with Windows 8.1, and, like other Windows 8.1 machines, will be eligible for a free upgrade to Windows 10 when it comes out later this year. What’s unique in this case is that because HP worked so closely with Microsoft, the x360 is perhaps better optimized for Windows than some of its competitors. For now, most of that optimization has centered on Windows 8.1, but representatives from both camps have indicated to me that after the x360 went on sale, they’d be shifting their engineering resources to focus more on Win 10. Configuration options The Spectre x360 is currently offered in three configurations, priced at $900, $1, 150 and $1, 400. Starting with the entry-level model, you get the same Core i5-5200U processor I tested here, along with 4GB of RAM and a 1080p touchscreen. Of the three, this is the only one that’s customizable, with options to double the RAM ($50), add a Quad HD screen ($100) or upgrade to a dual-core i7 processor ($150). You can also swap out the standard 128GB SSD for a 256GB one ($50) or a 512GB disk ($200). Moving on, the $1, 150 model keeps the 1, 920 x 1, 080 display, but steps up to a Core i7 CPU, 8GB of memory and 256GB of storage. Finally, there’s the top-of-the-line $1, 400 model, which has a higher-res 2, 560 x 1, 440 screen and a 512GB SSD (in addition to a Core i7 CPU and 8GB of RAM). That’s currently sold out on HP’s site, but a company spokesperson says it should be back in stock within the coming weeks. Either way, if you were doing the math earlier, you saw that configuring the base $900 model with tricked-out specs comes to the same price of $1, 400, so really, it’s not actually “out of stock”; you just have to check off more boxes to get it. The competition I’ve read other tech writers refer to the HP Spectre x360 as a “MacBook Air competitor.” That’s fair, but also a little lazy: It’s a MacBook Air competitor to the extent that every Windows Ultrabook is. The point is, if it’s a thin-and-light, high-end laptop you’re looking for, you’ve got lots of options. Too many options, almost. For the sake of not overwhelming you, let’s just focus on the best. Perhaps the most direct comparison would be to the Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro ($1, 249-plus), which also has a 360-degree hinge and flagship specs. At just 2.6 pounds and half an inch thick, it is insanely thin and light, especially for a laptop with a touchscreen and a convertible design. That said, that thinness and lightness come with a couple trade-offs. For one, that compact design is only possible thanks to one of Intel’s lower-power Core M processors , which, while perfectly adequate for basic tasks, is not as robust as a fifth-gen Core CPU. Two, there isn’t much room for a big battery inside that slim chassis. Indeed, the battery life falls four hours short of what you’ll get on the Spectre x360, though it admittedly isn’t much better than other skinny Ultrabooks. If you can live without a convertible design, your options become even more plentiful. Our new favorite is the Dell XPS 13 ($800-plus), which crams a 13-inch display into the body of an 11-inch machine, making it way more compact than other machines with the same screen size. At 2.6 pounds, it too is very light for a touchscreen system, and we’re fans of its comfy keyboard, fast performance, vibrant screen and surprisingly good audio. My main gripes are that the battery life is merely average, at least if you configure it with a touchscreen, and that if you do want a touch panel, it costs an extra $500. That’s because the only touchscreen option has 3, 200 x 1, 800 resolution; you can’t get it with a full HD touch panel, like with the Spectre x360. A shame, that. Other solid options include the Samsung ATIV Book 9 Plus ($1, 299 and up) and the skinny Acer Aspire S7-393 ($1, 300), both of which have been updated with Intel’s new fifth-gen Core processors. Lastly, yes, there’s the 13-inch MacBook Air , which starts at $999. This, too, was recently refreshed with Intel’s Broadwell CPUs, with the battery life still rated for up to 12 hours. As ever, we enjoy the aluminum design (though it’s slightly heavier than the competition, at 2.96 pounds), as well as the keyboard and best-in-class trackpad. The biggest trade-off you’ll make here is the screen quality: It’s the only laptop in the Mac lineup that doesn’t have a Retina display; just 1, 440 x 900 on the 13-inch model. Wrap-up I asked at the beginning of this review if there’s anything not to like about the Spectre x360. Indeed there is: the machine’s relative heaviness. At three-plus pounds, it’s hardly a clunker, but it is noticeably weightier than other 13-inch machines. Curiously, though, that weight also makes possible so many of the things I like about the laptop. Because the x360 is slightly bulkier than its rivals, it can accommodate a cushier keyboard and a bigger battery, allowing for nearly best-in-class runtime. It also makes room for a ton of ports. If you’re shopping in this size class, I’d also suggest you consider a few other models, like the lighter-weight Dell XPS 13, but even then, the specs HP offers for the money are hard to beat. Particularly if you prefer something with a more convertible design, the x360 is a strong — and reasonably priced — choice. Filed under: Laptops , Microsoft , HP Comments

Original post:
HP Spectre x360 review: What happens when Microsoft helps build a laptop?

Dish brings over 200 international channels to Sling TV

As of today, Dish Network’s on-demand international service has a new name: Sling International . Formerly known as DishWorld, it consists of more than 200 international channels spanning 18 languages. Packages start at $15, and not surprisingly, you’ll be able to access it through the Sling TV apps, or through a new Sling International app. Given the solid launch for Sling TV, Dish’s $20 digital TV service , it makes sense for the company to consolidate its on-demand offerings. It also makes Sling TV seem more and more like a traditional subscription TV offering — which is great for people who demand plenty of choice. “Sling TV grew from the foundation established by DishWorld, enabling us to test, grow and perfect our OTT capabilities through a service that streams tens of millions of hours of content every month, ” Sling TV CEO Roger Lynch said in a statement. While Dish managed to be the first company to roll out a significant on-demand TV service, we’re also hearing that Apple is planning to unveil its own service later this year (likely along with some new Apple TV devices). Together with Netflix, Hulu Plus, Amazon’s streaming video and HBO Now, 2015 may end up being the year more people consider dumping their traditional cable subscriptions. But of course, they’ll just be exchanging one massive subscription for a bunch of cheaper ones. Filed under: HD Comments Source: Sling

Visit link:
Dish brings over 200 international channels to Sling TV

NASA and Boeing to test eco-friendly technologies for airplanes

Boeing’s new ecoDemonstrator (a 757) is slated to go on a series of flights this spring to try out two of NASA’s experimental fuel-saving techniques. One of them’s the Active Flow Control Enhanced Vertical Tail Flight Experiment, which entails installing 31 tiny jets on a plane’s vertical tail or dorsal fin, as you can see below the fold. These jets can manipulate the flow of air over the tail’s surface and generate enough force to stabilize the plane during takeoff and landing, even if the fin’s around 17 percent smaller than usual. A smaller tail means a lighter plane and, hence, lower fuel consumption. A few weeks after putting the teensy jets through the wringer, ecoDemonstrator will do another series of flights to test five different insect-repellent plane coatings. Apparently, even something as small as bugs can disturb the flow of air around the plane’s wings and cause drag. Planes can reduce fuel consumption by around six percent if that air flow remains smooth. That sounds like such a small number, but it could still save airlines millions of dollars on fuel and lead to lower emissions . NASA already ensured that these two technologies work in a laboratory setting. But they still need to go through field testing to see if they can survive the harsh environments airplanes typically face. They’re only two of the eight projects being developed under the agency’s Environmentally Responsible Aviation ( ERA ) initiative, though, so expect more test flights to take to the skies after spring. [Image credit: Boeing / John D. Parker] Filed under: Transportation Comments Source: NASA

Read More:
NASA and Boeing to test eco-friendly technologies for airplanes

Google intros a way to run Android apps on desktop platforms

A handful of Android apps made their way to Chrome OS last year, thanks to Google’s native client called App Runtime for Chrome (ARC). Now, Google is giving all Android developers access to ARC and not just well-known ones like the creators of Evernote and Vine (two of the apps ported in 2014). To be exact, Mountain View has released an app/browser extension called ARC Welder that packages Android APKs into applications for Chrome OS and other desktop platforms. Yes, these converted apps could work even on Mac, Windows and Linux computers loaded with the Chrome browser. We say “could, ” because the final products don’t always work. Ars Technica put a few applications to the test and found that a lot of them don’t run on computers, because, well, they were designed for smartphones and tablets. Developers can tweak their creations if they stop running after going through ARC Welder, though. Once they’re done, they can upload the files directly to the Chrome Web Store. Even if you’re not a developer, you can still use ARC Welder to convert APKs on your own, but as we said, don’t be surprised if some of them don’t work. Filed under: Laptops , Google Comments Via: OMG! Chrome! Source: Chrome Developers , ARC Welder

Follow this link:
Google intros a way to run Android apps on desktop platforms

Comcast’s new broadband service is twice as fast as Google Fiber

Comcast has drawn a new battle line against Google Fiber by launching a 2Gbps fiber broadband service called Gigabit Pro . It arrives next month in Atlanta and will be available in 18 million homes across the US by the end of the year. The package will deliver symmetric uploads and downloads like Fiber does, but at twice its 1Gbps speed. Mountain View had already announced that it would bring Fiber to Atlanta, but Comcast will now beat it to the punch both in timing and data rates. Comcast also tweaked Google’s nose by saying “our approach is to offer the most comprehensive rollout of multi-gigabit service to the most homes as quickly as possible, not just to certain neighborhoods.” That’s a reference to the search giant’s glacially slow rollout of its highly-sought service. However, most consumers don’t mind dealing with Google, something Comcast certainly can’t say. It’s been mired in bad press over customer service issues , and has adamantly opposed new net neutrality rules that are favored by consumers. That said, the sheer speed of the service is impressive. Comcast emphasized that you’ll need to be in an urban center near its fiber network and will require a “professional-grade” installation. It hasn’t revealed pricing yet, but given similarities to its business-grade service, we’d expect it to be costly. However, you might get a break if you’re in a city that also has Google Fiber. Filed under: Internet Comments Via: The Verge Source: Comcast

View post:
Comcast’s new broadband service is twice as fast as Google Fiber

This is how you refuel Zero’s electric motorcycle

If there’s one problem to racing a super-cool electric motorcycle, it’s that pit stops tend to be a bit slow. After all, in the time it takes a regular hot rod to refuel, you’ve probably only gained one or two percent of charge. That’s why Zero Motorcycles has created a patent pending hot-swappable battery system for the Zero FX that enables you to “refuel” the e-bike in just over half a minute. The clip below shows you how quickly this can be done out on the track, which makes us want to buy one of these $10, 000 bikes even more than before. Filed under: Transportation Comments

View the original here:
This is how you refuel Zero’s electric motorcycle

Amazon brings back the white Kindle e-reader in China and Japan

Have you missed white Kindle e-readers ever since they disappeared in 2012? So has Amazon. The internet retailer has quietly unveiled a white version of its basic Kindle reader that’s headed to at least China on April 8th, and Japan on April 20th. It’s virtually identical to the $79 black model, including the 800 x 600 e-paper touchscreen, WiFi and 4GB of storage — you’re really just getting a cosmetic change here. Still, it’s hard not to be curious about Amazon’s sudden nostalgia kick. We’ve reached out to Amazon to find out if and when the white Kindle will reach other parts of the globe, and we’ll let you know if there are any additional launches in the cards. Filed under: Amazon Comments Via: Ink, Bits & Pixels Source: Amazon.cn , Amazon.co.jp

View original post here:
Amazon brings back the white Kindle e-reader in China and Japan

Charter buys a cable company to make up for losing Time Warner

Charter lost out on its chance to snatch Time Warner Cable before Comcast made its move , so it’s settling for the next best thing. The company just unveiled plans to acquire Bright House Networks , a cable provider that’s mostly big in Florida, for about $10.4 billion. Reportedly, the move is about getting “strategic flexibility” and solidifying Charter’s position as the second-largest cable company in the US. In other words, it wants to both improve its clout in relation to Comcast (even if the two don’t have competing networks) and streamline its costs. That last part is important in an era where services like Netflix are diminishing the importance of conventional TV. If Charter can’t have TWC, it can at least prepare for a future where it can’t depend on expensive programming bundles to turn a profit. [Image credit: AP Photo/Matt Rourke] Filed under: Home Entertainment , Internet , HD Comments Via: Wall Street Journal Source: Charter

Taken from:
Charter buys a cable company to make up for losing Time Warner