For Microsoft, the future of computing isn’t just virtual reality — it’s “mixed reality, ” the company’s term encapsulating AR and VR experiences . That started with HoloLens , but that device costs $3, 000 and is targeted at developers. But Microsoft has something else in mind for consumers: $300 VR headsets from PC makers like Dell and HP. Until now, the closest we’ve come to Microsoft’s mixed reality vision was by touching (but not using) a Lenovo headset . That all changed last week when I put on Acer’s Windows 10 headset. At first glance, the unnamed headset doesn’t look like anything special. But look a bit closer and you’ll notice a few intriguing elements, including two cameras on the front, and a sharp, almost racecar-like design. The visor portion of the headset can also flip up, so you can easily see what’s happening in the real world without taking it off entirely (something Lenovo’s entry also does). Unfortunately, I wasn’t allowed to take any photos, but it looks exactly like the model we saw back at CES (albeit in a bright blue instead of red). I had no trouble putting on the headset while wearing glasses, though it was a bit tough to adjust the headstrap without actually seeing it. Like the Vive and many other VR headsets I’ve tried, Acer’s entry is fairly front-heavy, so it might take some adjustment to make it feel comfortable. Once I found a decent fit, it felt like something I could easily wear for an hour or more. Those two cameras on the front are the most intriguing part of Acer’s headset, as they allow it to track your environment and head position without the need for external sensors like the Oculus Rift and HTC Vive. This technique, known as “inside out” tracking, is an offshoot of what Microsoft developed for HoloLens. The goal: to make VR setup easier for consumers, removing the need to drill holes into your walls for the Vive’s lighthouses, or find desk space for the Rift’s standing sensor. That solves one of the biggest problems Microsoft noticed the offering Rift and Vive units at its stores: Lots of buyers would return VR hardware because it was too tough to set up. Once I put on the headset, I was thrust into a virtual living room somewhere in the Pacific Northwest. Unfortunately, I was stick with using an Xbox One controller to navigate the environment — a huge step down from the Rift and Vive’s motion controllers. I was able to teleport and walk around around the room, as well as pick up and view virtual objects. While the environment wasn’t particularly detailed, it looked sharp on Acer’s headset. And most importantly, I didn’t get dizzy, even as I was moving my head around to take in the virtual space. Just like HoloLens, this new crop of Mixed Reality headsets will let you access just about every app and tool you’d otherwise use in Windows 10. That includes Universal apps, as well as those made for HoloLens. So you could conceivably throw up a video onto a wall in your virtual living room while you’re browsing the web or working on an Office doc. I didn’t have much time to run software on the headset, but I was able to move around a model of the solar system with the controller and by tilting my head. When I pushed in on Jupiter and other planets for a close-up view, they all looked sharp and clear. It was evident from the demo that Microsoft isn’t targeting high-end VR with $300 headsets like Acer’s. Instead, it’s aiming for a middle ground between mobile VR and what we’re seeing from the Rift and Vive. The company bets that relatively inexpensive headsets powered by mid-range machines will make up the majority of the PC VR market. The Acer unit I tested was powered by a gaming laptop, but the company claims computers with integrated graphics will also be able to run mixed reality headsets later this year. That’s partially due to low-end graphics getting better over time, but Microsoft claims it can also handle VR more efficiently since its Mixed Reality platform is built directly into the OS. It’s not relying on a separate app like the competition. Microsoft has also partnered with 3Glasses for a much more powerful headset which beats out Oculus and HTC’s offerings when it comes to specs, so it’s not ignoring the high-end entirely. Microsoft has made it clear that VR will be a big part of its Xbox One successor, Project Scorpio. While the company hasn’t made any official announcements regarding these low-end headsets and Scorpio, it’s something I expect we’ll hear more about at E3 in June. Given that the company’s next console is powerful enough to handle true 4K gaming, and it’s technically powered by Windows 10, it’s easy to see how it could integrate with these headsets. As for that Windows-powered HTC Vive we saw back at Computex, Microsoft says that device was just a mockup. The company doesn’t currently have any deals with HTC, but it’s open to working something out. That’s partly because Microsoft is eager to reduce the fragmentation of the VR market with Windows Mixed Reality. That’s self-serving, of course, but Microsoft has a point: Virtual reality has to be easier for consumers to jump into if we actually want it to succeed. This Acer headset, along with the first batch of offerings from PC manufacturers, will mainly be targeted at developers with the Windows Creators Update. But Microsoft is confident it will have something consumer grade to show by the holiday season. It’s taken a few years, but it won’t be long until we see if Microsoft’s bet on mixed reality actually pays off.
Read the original post:
Acer’s $300 Windows headset bodes well for the future of cheap VR
An anonymous reader writes: With the launch of the Windows 10 Creators Update and Edge 40 (EdgeHTML 15), Microsoft has released a new battery usage test that, naturally, trashes the company’s competition. This new test shows that Edge uses less power than both Chrome 57 and Firefox 52, and is bound to draw a response from its competition, especially Google, who doesn’t like it when Microsoft takes a jab at Chrome’s efficiency. The same thing happened last year, in June, when a similar test showcasing Edge’s longer battery life was met with responses from both Google and Opera. The most recent tests were performed for the launch of Windows 10 Creators Update. Two tests were carried out until a laptop’s battery gave out. For each browser, a minimum of 16 iterations were recorded per test. The first test measured normal browsing performance and the second ran a looped Vimeo fullscreen video. In the normal browsing performance test, Microsoft claims Edge used 31% less power than Chrome 57, and 44% less power than Firefox 52. In the second test, Edge played a looped Vimeo video in fullscreen for 751 minutes (12:31:08), while Chrome lasted 557 minutes (9:17:03) and Firefox for only 424 minutes (7:04:19). That’s a whopping three hours over Chrome, and five hours above Firefox. Read more of this story at Slashdot. 
