Larry Offers Personalized Legal Help via Text Message

Larry is a service from the folks at Lawtrades that’s designed to give you near-instantaneous legal help whenever you might need it. All you have to do is send Larry a text message (once you’ve signed up, of course), and you’ll get a personalized response, specific to your situation and where you are. Read more…

Read More:
Larry Offers Personalized Legal Help via Text Message

Sharing Night-Time Photos Of The Eiffel Tower Is Illegal

Here’s a fun but depressing Saturday afternoon fact: taking and sharing photos of the Eiffel tower at night is a copyright violation that could land you with a hefty fine (not that it’s stopped the selfie-snapping masses, of course). Read more…

Excerpt from:
Sharing Night-Time Photos Of The Eiffel Tower Is Illegal

You Get Free Red Bull or $10 If You Bought One In the Last 12 Years

A class-action lawsuit against Red Bull is being settled, and if you’ve purchased any Red Bull products in the last 12 years, you can get a piece of the pie. No proof of purchase required. Read more…

View article:
You Get Free Red Bull or $10 If You Bought One In the Last 12 Years

FBI Facial Recognition Caught a Fugitive on the Run For 14 Years

The FBI’s facial recognition initiative is big and getting bigger . And it’s just proved that it works too, by helping capture a fugitive who’s been on the run for 14 years, during testing in Asia. Read more…

See the original article here:
FBI Facial Recognition Caught a Fugitive on the Run For 14 Years

The NYPD’s Biggest Gang Raid Was Informed By 1 Million Facebook Posts

In the early hours of June 4th, the New York Police Department raided the General Ulysses S. Grant and Manhattanville housing projects in West Harlem. Its biggest gang raid ever, it saw 40 suspects arrested—and it was masterminded by mining over 1 million Facebook posts. Read more…

Continued here:
The NYPD’s Biggest Gang Raid Was Informed By 1 Million Facebook Posts

Microsoft has won the right to disclose the FBI’s demand for information about Office 365 customer–

Microsoft has won the right to disclose the FBI’s demand for information about Office 365 customer—a pretty significant victory for transparency and free speech. Read more…

Visit link:
Microsoft has won the right to disclose the FBI’s demand for information about Office 365 customer–

The European Union Court of Justice has ruled that people can ask Google to delete sensitive informa

The European Union Court of Justice has ruled that people can ask Google to delete sensitive information from its Internet search results. Maybe that’ll happen in the U.S. at some point, too? Read more…

View the original here:
The European Union Court of Justice has ruled that people can ask Google to delete sensitive informa

Public Resource wants to liberate tax records for US nonprofits – converting 100lbs of scanned bitmaps on DVDs into searchable data on $1.5T worth…

Rogue archivist Carl Malamud sez, On November 1, Public.Resource.Org released a new service which put 6,461,326 US nonprofit tax returns on the net for bulk download, developers, and search engines to access. We offered to give the working system to the government, and also sent them a few suggestions on ways they could better meet their mission and save themselves a boatload of money. Since then, we’ve been frantically trying to get the government’s attention to take decisive action, but to no avail. The way the government makes the nonprofit tax returns available to the public is broken in many ways. The IRS insists on selling the tax returns as a monthly feed of DVDs costing $2,580 per year. Each month, I get a stack of a dozen DVDs, each one has 60,000 1-page TIFF files on it. This is just so lacking in clue, and even simple suggestions like using Dropbox instead of mailing us DVDs have been ignored. In terms of breakage though, the truly big problem is the deliberate dumbing down of tax returns for large nonprofits in order to avoid what an IRS official actually said to us would be “too much transparency.” All the big nonprofits have to e-file their tax returns. E-filing means they submit actual machine-processable data encoded in XML. The way the IRS releases that information is mind-boggling. They image the data onto tax forms and then release them as 200 dot per inch TIFF files. So, instead of having a computer program extract the gross revenue, or the CEO salaries, or whether or not the nonprofit operates a tanning salon on premises (an actual question on the form!), you get something that is so bad that OCR is difficult. Nonprofits are a $1.5 trillion chunk of the U.S. economy, yet we’re deliberately dumbing down data that could make that sector more efficient and more vibrant. That’s dumb. Since November, we’ve been trying to get the IRS and the Obama Administration to release this information, but they’ve refused. We’ve met with all sorts of IRS officials such as Lois Lerner and Joseph Grant of Tea Party fame, and we’ve also met with a ton of boldface names in the White House, such as Todd Park (the President’s CTO) and Steve VanRoekel (the Federal CIO). Nobody will release the data. The IRS is worried the big nonprofits will be upset if information such as multimillion-dollar CEO salaries is more readily available. Since discussion hasn’t worked so far, we’ve retained the services of Thomas R. Burke, an eminent First Amendment attorney at Davis Wright Tremaine and he’s been working with our own counselor David Halperin. Today, they filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. One reason we picked the Northern District because they have a requirement that the parties try and work out their problems out of court using what is known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), which includes techniques such as mediation and arbitration. The ADR rules in this District Court require each party to bring to the mediation an official who has the authority to resolve this issue. So, I’m reaching out to my good friends Todd Park and Steve VanRoekel, the architects of the President’s great new machine-processable data directive, and I’m personally asking them to help us resolve this dispute with the administration. We’re all on the same side here, let’s work this out and get on with the real job at hand! Links: Our complaint in district court Copies of our letters back and forth to the White House and the IRS Sunlight Foundation: Nonprofit E-file Data Should Be Open Think Progress: How the IRS Could Make it Easier to Track Dark Money, Right Now Forbes: IRS: Turn Over a New Leaf, Open Up Data        

Visit site:
Public Resource wants to liberate tax records for US nonprofits – converting 100lbs of scanned bitmaps on DVDs into searchable data on $1.5T worth…

DHS on border laptop searches: we can’t tell you why this is legal, and we won’t limit searches to reasonable suspicion

The DHS has responded to a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the ACLU asking when and how it decides whose laptop to search at the border. It explained its legal rationale for conducting these searches with a blank page: On Page 18 of the 52-page document under the section entitled “First Amendment,” several paragraphs are completely blacked out. They simply end with the sentence: “The laptop border searches in the [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] and [Customs and Border Protection] do not violate travelers’ First Amendment rights as defined by the courts.” More excellence from “the most transparent administration in American history.” Also, the DHS rejected claims that it should limit searches to situations where it had reasonable grounds for suspicion, because then they would have to explain their suspicion: First, commonplace decisions to search electronic devices might be opened to litigation challenging the reasons for the search. In addition to interfering with a carefully constructed border security system, the litigation could directly undermine national security by requiring the government to produce sensitive investigative and national security information to justify some of the most critical searches. Even a policy change entirely unenforceable by courts might be problematic; we have been presented with some noteworthy CBP and ICE success stories based on hard-to-articulate intuitions or hunches based on officer experience and judgment. Under a reasonable suspicion requirement, officers might hesitate to search an individual’s device without the presence of articulable factors capable of being formally defended, despite having an intuition or hunch based on experience that justified a search. Feds say they can search your laptop at the border but won’t say why [Cyrus Farivar/Ars Technica]        

Read More:
DHS on border laptop searches: we can’t tell you why this is legal, and we won’t limit searches to reasonable suspicion